Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Monday, July 23, 2012
Save the Eagle Tavern
Please join the Milk Club and email these supervisors and mayor.
Use our words or your own. Tell our electeds why this IS OUR SPACE!
MILK CLUB LETTER ON THE EAGLE CLUB’S SALE
It has recently come to our attention that a non-LGBT group of entrepreneurs has entered into a purchase agreement for the former Eagle Tavern. This comes as a shock to many in the LGBT community as there was no outreach done or notice given about this historical community space despite the fact that many LGBT San Franciscans had expressed much interest in the building’s future. Furthermore our community had previously heard that there were queer entrepreneurs in negotiation to take over this space; buyers who intended to return it to a place that would continue to serve as a center to those who previously patronized the Eagle and enjoyed it as a LGBT-friendly space.
This startling change of course has caused great concern within those of us who considered the Eagle as a haven and who still view it as a revered symbol of San Francisco’s continued struggle with the HIV/AIDS epidemic and a critical meeting site for the marginalized queer community. To our dismay, such spaces are becoming scarcer, and our marginalization is becoming more profound. The Eagle is more than a bar and a business, yet current city processes appear to regard it as just another tavern. The Eagle is hallowed ground for us, and we as stakeholders must participate in any decisions about its future through a vigorous community-wide dialogue where all voices can be heard.
We offer here several specific reasons why we consider the Eagle to be a sacred space. They are given so that you can understand and respect our alarm at these developments:
*The ashes of gay men and women who died during the AIDS epidemic are scattered there.
*The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence have blessed it as hallowed queer space and have used it to veil many postulants.
*Over its 30 year history over $50 million was raised for charities, particularly HIV/AIDS organizations.
**It was a place that was accessible to the full spectrum of diversity of the LGBT community.
It was our community center.
Given the historical, cultural, and emotional significance of this site we find it just to demand a process where all members of the queer community have an opportunity to participate in decisions regarding its future. We demand that an open meeting be held at the earliest possible date and ask that our elected officials, community representatives, the general public, and all key parties be in attendance. We also believe that the Eagle must be given Historic Landmark status.
South of Market is undergoing a massive shift in its composition and it is important to allow members of the community to speak for themselves before rash decisions about its future are made. We look forward to this discussion.
Your name here!
Jane.Kim@sfgov.org (D6 home of the Eagle)
Scott.Weiner@sfgov.org (D8)
Christina.Olague@sfgov.org (D5 and head of committee reg. liquor license transfer)
David.Chiu@sfgo.org (D3 President of the BOS)
David.Campos@sfgov.org (D9)
John.Avalos@sfgov.org (D11)
Sean.Elsbernd@sfgov.org (D7 on committee for liquor license transfer)
Carmen.Chu@sfgov.org (D4)
Mark.Farrell@sfgov.org (D2)
Malia.Cohen@sfgov.org (D10)
Eric.L.Mar@sfgov.org (D1)
Ed.Lee@sfgov.org (Mayor)
Use our words or your own. Tell our electeds why this IS OUR SPACE!
MILK CLUB LETTER ON THE EAGLE CLUB’S SALE
It has recently come to our attention that a non-LGBT group of entrepreneurs has entered into a purchase agreement for the former Eagle Tavern. This comes as a shock to many in the LGBT community as there was no outreach done or notice given about this historical community space despite the fact that many LGBT San Franciscans had expressed much interest in the building’s future. Furthermore our community had previously heard that there were queer entrepreneurs in negotiation to take over this space; buyers who intended to return it to a place that would continue to serve as a center to those who previously patronized the Eagle and enjoyed it as a LGBT-friendly space.
This startling change of course has caused great concern within those of us who considered the Eagle as a haven and who still view it as a revered symbol of San Francisco’s continued struggle with the HIV/AIDS epidemic and a critical meeting site for the marginalized queer community. To our dismay, such spaces are becoming scarcer, and our marginalization is becoming more profound. The Eagle is more than a bar and a business, yet current city processes appear to regard it as just another tavern. The Eagle is hallowed ground for us, and we as stakeholders must participate in any decisions about its future through a vigorous community-wide dialogue where all voices can be heard.
We offer here several specific reasons why we consider the Eagle to be a sacred space. They are given so that you can understand and respect our alarm at these developments:
*The ashes of gay men and women who died during the AIDS epidemic are scattered there.
*The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence have blessed it as hallowed queer space and have used it to veil many postulants.
*Over its 30 year history over $50 million was raised for charities, particularly HIV/AIDS organizations.
**It was a place that was accessible to the full spectrum of diversity of the LGBT community.
It was our community center.
Given the historical, cultural, and emotional significance of this site we find it just to demand a process where all members of the queer community have an opportunity to participate in decisions regarding its future. We demand that an open meeting be held at the earliest possible date and ask that our elected officials, community representatives, the general public, and all key parties be in attendance. We also believe that the Eagle must be given Historic Landmark status.
South of Market is undergoing a massive shift in its composition and it is important to allow members of the community to speak for themselves before rash decisions about its future are made. We look forward to this discussion.
Your name here!
Jane.Kim@sfgov.org (D6 home of the Eagle)
Scott.Weiner@sfgov.org (D8)
Christina.Olague@sfgov.org (D5 and head of committee reg. liquor license transfer)
David.Chiu@sfgo.org (D3 President of the BOS)
David.Campos@sfgov.org (D9)
John.Avalos@sfgov.org (D11)
Sean.Elsbernd@sfgov.org (D7 on committee for liquor license transfer)
Carmen.Chu@sfgov.org (D4)
Mark.Farrell@sfgov.org (D2)
Malia.Cohen@sfgov.org (D10)
Eric.L.Mar@sfgov.org (D1)
Ed.Lee@sfgov.org (Mayor)
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Gays being Gay in San Francisco
In the past 2 weeks the Gay Community and our Culture has received a sucker punch both in public and in private.
In a lively debate about astro turf and bright lights at the Beach Chalet, Supervisor Elsburnd asked the question about the safety of children due to gay cruising in the bushes. To this police Chief Gregg Shur replied that he and his manly soccer friends are afraid to go into the bushes; all kidding aside.
I thought this was an environmental issue being discussed but if it is really a question of getting bright lights so fags don*t cruise in the bushes, don*t bother we have Grinder for that now. As for me being a danger to children I could go into the fact that most pedophiles are straight but refrain from going there. NOT!
In fact straight people are a generally violent lot compared to the faries and dykes I know. So look in the mirror if you wanna see who is hurting the children. Thats not my big gay culture staring back at you is it. Thats why I could care less about assimilation. I am proud of my culture. Oh and fear not she aint after no chillen! PUH leze!~
I don*t think gay men need to apologize for our behavior either. Just because straight people don*t care to have it around or understand it. It*s was through our generous persecution we ended up in the bushes in the first place.
Then the Eagle tavern liquor license debate. Now I know you can*t tell landlords and business owners what to do but I can ask Mark Rennie why he is working on a deal to oust 3 gay men in negotiations to buy the Eagle in favor of 5 straight men. Could have something to do with the Landlords broker being tied to the building housing Foreign Cinema and one of the new straight investors being part owner of Foreign Cinema. There is a connection but i just can*t quite put my penis... er um finger on it.
In his letter; that I understand was actually written by the 3 queers also having an exclusive deal with the Eagle property broker and a SOMA based liquor license as compared to the one that is on import from the Mission; Mr Rennie notes the sights importance to the Gay community and our historic ties to the space. I may be wrong but I do not think Mr Rennie is a man of the bushes so I question why he speaks for us.
I*m worried that while we are noshing on our oven fresh pizza on the patio at the economically feasible beer bust we can remember the golden showers of yester year as commemorated by a plaque. This must be what Mr Rennie alludes to in his letter because those are the plans. The real kicker is the clever name of this enterprising group, Double Rainbow.
Personally I would rather we Queers speak for ourselves and own our own cultural institutions. It just gives it that authentic feel.
Now I have that off my chest I am heading to the mirror to apply my Queer war paint. Lots of work to do in the city these days.
In a lively debate about astro turf and bright lights at the Beach Chalet, Supervisor Elsburnd asked the question about the safety of children due to gay cruising in the bushes. To this police Chief Gregg Shur replied that he and his manly soccer friends are afraid to go into the bushes; all kidding aside.
I thought this was an environmental issue being discussed but if it is really a question of getting bright lights so fags don*t cruise in the bushes, don*t bother we have Grinder for that now. As for me being a danger to children I could go into the fact that most pedophiles are straight but refrain from going there. NOT!
In fact straight people are a generally violent lot compared to the faries and dykes I know. So look in the mirror if you wanna see who is hurting the children. Thats not my big gay culture staring back at you is it. Thats why I could care less about assimilation. I am proud of my culture. Oh and fear not she aint after no chillen! PUH leze!~
I don*t think gay men need to apologize for our behavior either. Just because straight people don*t care to have it around or understand it. It*s was through our generous persecution we ended up in the bushes in the first place.
Then the Eagle tavern liquor license debate. Now I know you can*t tell landlords and business owners what to do but I can ask Mark Rennie why he is working on a deal to oust 3 gay men in negotiations to buy the Eagle in favor of 5 straight men. Could have something to do with the Landlords broker being tied to the building housing Foreign Cinema and one of the new straight investors being part owner of Foreign Cinema. There is a connection but i just can*t quite put my penis... er um finger on it.
In his letter; that I understand was actually written by the 3 queers also having an exclusive deal with the Eagle property broker and a SOMA based liquor license as compared to the one that is on import from the Mission; Mr Rennie notes the sights importance to the Gay community and our historic ties to the space. I may be wrong but I do not think Mr Rennie is a man of the bushes so I question why he speaks for us.
I*m worried that while we are noshing on our oven fresh pizza on the patio at the economically feasible beer bust we can remember the golden showers of yester year as commemorated by a plaque. This must be what Mr Rennie alludes to in his letter because those are the plans. The real kicker is the clever name of this enterprising group, Double Rainbow.
Personally I would rather we Queers speak for ourselves and own our own cultural institutions. It just gives it that authentic feel.
Now I have that off my chest I am heading to the mirror to apply my Queer war paint. Lots of work to do in the city these days.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Friday, May 18, 2012
Farewell SF!
The day after Christmas I finally had the guts to leave a relationship that was becoming more verbally and physically abusive over the last two of seven years. I stayed for as long as I did because I knew if I left I would be homeless. Now I am homeless and have been at the mercy of friends for almost 6 months. That is too long.
I have been without proper medical attention for a year. I have been HIV + for 25 years. This is a problem.
I have a bird named Conrad who I need to look after. He can not become homeless. We have been together for 17 years. I have to take care of him.
These pressures added to my PTSD; (due to my relationships abusive nature); have made it impossible to continue on in this manner. I have to do something about my situation.
I am 45 years old and have found my way through a 17 year stint in SF and now just have to move on.
I have by some miracle in this very traumatic last 6 months been able to get 2 As in college, led a very productive 5 months at the Milk Club and almost 1 year at the Entertainment Commission.
Here in the city I have been in several Pride parades and Taken Back Polk, been part of the Castro Street Fair for 6 years, been Sainted by the Sisters, swilled beer at the Eagle and any other hole that served welcoming drinks, graduated from Miss Martys School of Beauty, dragged it out from Miss Trannyshack 2004 to Charlie Horse, and run for political office. I gave you my all SF!
I love this city and it is just my nature to try really hard, but I can achieve where ever I am. Since the city of San Francisco keeps selling itself out to the highest bidder and making deals like Twitter, I dont see how a temporary fix on my housing will help in the long run.
Am I bitter... Hell yes!
I am mad as fucking hell!
But I will get over it.
I love you SF and you had better show up for the Milk Party this Monday because I have made up my mind to leave on the 30th.
Milk Soriee will be my last big appearence and I wanna share it with you. Because I love you.
This was a great 17 years! Changed my life.
Anna
Also looking for a farewell party/moving fundraiser at the Cinch around the 27th.
Monday, May 14, 2012
NO to 8 Washington
Dear Supervisors,
As President of the Harvey Milk Club, I
write to join the growing chorus of housing and neighborhood
advocates opposing the 8 Washington luxury condo project. We
ask you to reject its flawed EIR and deny the precedent setting
bonuses it got from Planning including a 62% increase in height, a
doubling of bulk and quadrupling of parking. This might have been
justified for affordable housing but these condos will sell for $2.5
to over $7.5 million each including not 1 or 2 but 7 penthouses.
This is not
the kind of housing San Franciscans want or need. It is housing for
the ½ of 1%. A lot of it will be second, third and fourth homes for
millionaires. As you know from a recent report by your Budget
Analyst, this is the one (and only) category of housing in San
Francisco that is overbuilt. Why build more?
In addition to the obvious problems
with this project, it would also:
• reward owners of the Golden Gateway
(they own 80% of the 8 Washington site)
at the same
time they’re converting many of their 1,254 rent-controlled
apartments
to short-term hotel use, destroying
the kind of housing we actually do need.
• allow the Port to divert $30
million of future City tax revenue to Port projects,
including giving the developer a $5
million city subsidy.
• create a 400-car underground garage
for a project touted as “transit oriented”
• put 20,000 dump trucks on The
Embarcadero, up to one every 2 minutes, to
remove 110,000 cubic yards of dirt
to build an underground (underwater) garage.
• destroy an active recreation
facility used by thousands of residents each year.
Finally, the
developer wants you to believe that those who oppose this outrageous
project are “just a few vocal neighbors” or “the rich fighting
the very rich”. That is simply not true. I join with the SF Tenants
Union, Housing Rights Committee, Senior Action Network, San Francisco
Tomorrow, SF ACCE, Affordable Housing Alliance, the Golden Gateway
Tenants Association, the SF Green Party, the Coalition for San
Francisco Neighborhoods and many more in opposing this ugly, needless
project.
Please join us.
Sincerely,
Anna Conda/Glendon Hyde
President of the Harvey Milk LGBT
Democratic Club
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)